{"id":2309,"date":"2025-12-25T12:01:47","date_gmt":"2025-12-25T12:01:47","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/xbrele.com\/?p=2309"},"modified":"2026-04-07T15:09:06","modified_gmt":"2026-04-07T15:09:06","slug":"vcb-rfq-checklist","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/xbrele.com\/de\/vcb-rfq-checklist\/","title":{"rendered":"Die 12 wichtigsten Fragen an einen VCB-Hersteller (Checkliste f\u00fcr Angebotsanfragen)"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>A vacuum circuit breaker RFQ goes sideways for two common reasons: suppliers quote a \u201cstandard breaker\u201d that doesn\u2019t match your real duty, or they quote the right nameplate numbers but leave gaps in testing, documentation, and interfaces that later stall commissioning. This checklist is designed to reduce both risks.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>You\u2019ll get 12 copy-paste RFQ questions, plus a simple scoring rubric so you can compare vendors without turning your evaluation into a debate.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\"\/>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"who-this-rfq-checklist-is-for-and-what-good-vendor-answers-look-like\">Who this RFQ checklist is for, and what \u201cgood\u201d vendor answers look like<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full\"><img decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"559\" src=\"https:\/\/xbrele.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/xbrele-fig-01-vcb-rfq-answer-quality-decision-tree.webp\" alt=\"Decision tree showing PASS, CLARIFY, and RED FLAG outcomes for VCB RFQ answers\" class=\"wp-image-2312\" srcset=\"https:\/\/xbrele.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/xbrele-fig-01-vcb-rfq-answer-quality-decision-tree.webp 1024w, https:\/\/xbrele.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/xbrele-fig-01-vcb-rfq-answer-quality-decision-tree-300x164.webp 300w, https:\/\/xbrele.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/xbrele-fig-01-vcb-rfq-answer-quality-decision-tree-768x419.webp 768w, https:\/\/xbrele.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/xbrele-fig-01-vcb-rfq-answer-quality-decision-tree-18x10.webp 18w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-element-caption\">Decision-tree rubric to classify manufacturer RFQ responses by completeness and traceability.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p>This checklist is for panel builders, EPCs, and industrial\/utility buyers who already know they need a VCB, but want quote-ready answers instead of sales language. A \u201cgood\u201d answer is measurable, configuration-specific, and document-backed.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Use this scoring rubric on every question:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>PASS (quote-ready)<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Quantified with units and scope (example duty stated as kV class, A, kA, plus what\u2019s included).<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Traceable: datasheet + drawing + test\/document list references (revision-controlled).<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Configuration matches your installation and control power (for example 110 VDC, 220 VAC) without \u201cequivalent substitutions.\u201d<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>CLARIFY (can proceed, but must close before PO)<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Partly quantified but missing boundary conditions (environment, enclosure, accessory scope).<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Uses ranges without committing to your line item (for example \u201c630\u20131250 A available\u201d with no selection).<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Mentions documents\/tests but can\u2019t list deliverables.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>RED FLAG (high risk)<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Vague claims like \u201cIEC compliant\u201d with no deliverable list or test basis.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Ignores fault duty or offers \u201cequivalent\u201d swaps without a technical justification.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>No stable model code, drawings, or traceability.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\"\/>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"question-set-a-system-context-you-must-provide-before-any-quotation\">Question set A \u2014 System context you must provide before any quotation<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>Manufacturers can\u2019t lock a correct configuration if your RFQ lacks system context. When you don\u2019t provide it, they\u2019ll often quote a generic build, then re-quote after clarification. That\u2019s where time and scope drift usually start.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Use this \u201cSystem Data Card\u201d as your RFQ input block.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Q1) What are the required electrical duties (kV class, A, kA, and frequency)?<\/strong><br>Include nominal voltage class (for example 12 kV or 24 kV), continuous current (for example 630 A or 1250 A), short-circuit interrupting duty (for example 25 kA or 31.5 kA), and frequency (50 Hz or 60 Hz).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Q2) What is the application duty: feeder, transformer protection, motor duty, capacitor bank, or generator tie?<\/strong><br>Different duties change what \u201celectrical endurance\u201d means and what accessories\/interlocks matter.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Q3) What installation type are you quoting: indoor withdrawable, indoor fixed, or outdoor cabinet\/pole style?<\/strong><br>If your team is still deciding, treat this as a gating decision: <a href=\"https:\/\/xbrele.com\/indoor-vs-outdoor-vcb-selection-guide\/\">indoor vs outdoor VCB selection guide<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Q4) What control power and interfaces are required (coils, aux contacts, interlocks, SCADA)?<\/strong><br>State control power (for example 110 VDC or 220 VAC), required aux contacts (NO\/NC count), and any interface expectations (wiring diagram, terminal style, protocol expectations if applicable).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Deliverable: A fill-in RFQ \u201cSystem Data Card\u201d (copy\/paste)<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Voltage class: ___ kV<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Continuous current: ___ A<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Interrupting duty (sym.): ___ kA<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Frequency: 50 Hz \/ 60 Hz<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Application duty: ___<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Installation type: indoor withdrawable \/ indoor fixed \/ outdoor ___<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Control power: ___ VDC or ___ VAC<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Aux contacts: ___ NO \/ ___ NC<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Interface notes: drawings, terminals, CT\/VT boundary, interlocks: ___<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\"\/>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"question-set-b-interrupter-insulation-credibility-checks-technical-gate\">Question set B \u2014 Interrupter + insulation credibility checks (technical gate)<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full\"><img decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"559\" src=\"https:\/\/xbrele.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/xbrele-fig-02-vcb-cutaway-interrupter-insulation-callouts.webp\" alt=\"VCB cutaway diagram with callouts for vacuum interrupter, mechanism, and insulation path\" class=\"wp-image-2311\" srcset=\"https:\/\/xbrele.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/xbrele-fig-02-vcb-cutaway-interrupter-insulation-callouts.webp 1024w, https:\/\/xbrele.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/xbrele-fig-02-vcb-cutaway-interrupter-insulation-callouts-300x164.webp 300w, https:\/\/xbrele.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/xbrele-fig-02-vcb-cutaway-interrupter-insulation-callouts-768x419.webp 768w, https:\/\/xbrele.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/xbrele-fig-02-vcb-cutaway-interrupter-insulation-callouts-18x10.webp 18w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-element-caption\">Annotated cutaway highlighting interrupter and insulation interfaces that must align with quoted duty.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p>This is your \u201cprove it\u201d section. You\u2019re not asking for a lecture. You\u2019re asking the vendor to show that the interrupter, insulation system, and mechanism are engineered for your stated duty\u2014not simply relabeled.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Q5) What is the interrupter duty basis for this exact configuration (not just the breaker nameplate)?<\/strong><br>A credible answer restates your duty with units (for example 12 kV class, 31.5 kA, 50 Hz) and confirms the interrupter selection is tied to that configuration.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Q6) How is dielectric withstand and insulation margin handled in the assembly (internal clearances, external creepage, interface points)?<\/strong><br>Ask them to describe where the controlling insulation path is (inside the pole, across external insulation surfaces, or at the terminal interface) and what conditions it assumes.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Q7) What mechanism type and operating margin are being quoted for the stated control power?<\/strong><br>The vendor should state mechanism type (spring-charged or other) and confirm operation is within the assumed control supply (for example 110 VDC).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Standards anchor (authority link):<\/strong> <a href=\"https:\/\/webstore.iec.ch\/en\/publication\/62785?utm_source=chatgpt.com\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">IEC 62271-100<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>For quick internal context before you challenge a vendor\u2019s interrupter claims: <a href=\"https:\/\/xbrele.com\/what-is-a-vacuum-interrupter\/\">what is a vacuum interrupter<\/a><br>For nameplate\/rating vocabulary that helps you interrogate quotes: <a href=\"https:\/\/xbrele.com\/vacuum-circuit-breaker-ratings\/\">vacuum circuit breaker ratings<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>[Expert Insight]<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>If a vendor can\u2019t restate your duty in one sentence with kV, A, and kA, expect clarification cycles after PO.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>\u201cIEC compliant\u201d without a deliverables list usually means you\u2019ll be chasing drawings and test records late.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Ask what is serialized (breaker, poles\/interrupters, mechanism). Traceability is a reliability signal, not paperwork theater.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\"\/>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"question-set-c-service-life-reliability-and-what-lifecycle-numbers-actually-mean\">Question set C \u2014 Service life, reliability, and what lifecycle numbers actually mean<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>Lifecycle claims can be real\u2014but only if you force the duty basis into the quote. Two vendors might both claim \u201c10,000 operations,\u201d yet one means mechanical operations with no electrical duty context.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Q8) What mechanical endurance is claimed (operations count), and what maintenance interval assumptions sit behind it?<\/strong><br>Ask for the operations number and what inspection cadence they assume (time-based and operation-based). Example: inspections every 12 months, with mechanism checks at a stated operation count.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Q9) What electrical endurance is claimed, explicitly tied to fault duty (kA) and voltage class (kV)?<\/strong><br>A credible answer looks like: \u201celectrical endurance: X operations at 31.5 kA, 12 kV class,\u201d plus what duty pattern they assume (rare faults vs frequent switching duty).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Deliverable: Comparison table template (drop into your evaluation sheet)<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Vendor \/ model code: ______<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Your duty: ___ kV class, ___ A, ___ kA<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Mechanical endurance: ______ operations<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Electrical endurance: ______ operations at ______ kA and ______ kV class<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Maintenance assumptions: ______<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Wear parts list (coils, charging motor, aux switch, springs, bearings): ______<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Warranty: ______ months; exclusions: ______<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Evidence (datasheet, endurance report, test record structure): ______<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\"\/>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"question-set-d-field-conditions-that-change-the-design-altitude-heat-pollution-salt-fog\">Question set D \u2014 Field conditions that change the design (altitude, heat, pollution, salt fog)<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full\"><img decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"559\" src=\"https:\/\/xbrele.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/xbrele-fig-03-site-conditions-design-changes-matrix.webp\" alt=\"Matrix linking site conditions to required VCB design adaptations and maintenance implications\" class=\"wp-image-2310\" srcset=\"https:\/\/xbrele.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/xbrele-fig-03-site-conditions-design-changes-matrix.webp 1024w, https:\/\/xbrele.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/xbrele-fig-03-site-conditions-design-changes-matrix-300x164.webp 300w, https:\/\/xbrele.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/xbrele-fig-03-site-conditions-design-changes-matrix-768x419.webp 768w, https:\/\/xbrele.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/xbrele-fig-03-site-conditions-design-changes-matrix-18x10.webp 18w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-element-caption\">Field-condition matrix linking environmental inputs to insulation, sealing, corrosion, and derating decisions.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p>Field conditions are where \u201csame rating\u201d equipment separates into \u201cstable in service\u201d versus \u201ctrips, tracks, or corrodes.\u201d Don\u2019t let suppliers answer this with \u201cno problem.\u201d Make them either confirm suitability or quote the adaptations and any derating.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Q10) Given our site conditions, what must change in insulation, sealing, corrosion protection, or ratings?<\/strong><br>Provide your site data, then ask them to respond with a specific confirmation or change list.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Deliverable: Site Conditions Addendum (buyer inputs + vendor confirmations)<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Buyer inputs:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Altitude: ___ m (for example 0 m, 2000 m, 3000 m)<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Ambient range: ___ \u00b0C min \/ ___ \u00b0C max (for example -25 \u00b0C to +40 \u00b0C, or -40 \u00b0C to +55 \u00b0C)<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Pollution\/contamination: light dust \/ heavy dust \/ industrial fumes \/ conductive dust<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Coastal exposure: yes\/no; distance to sea ___ km<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Installation: indoor room \/ outdoor kiosk \/ outdoor cabinet<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Maintenance reality: typical interval ___ months<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p>Vendor confirmations:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Altitude impact statement (confirm suitability or list design\/derating changes).<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Thermal margin statement at max ambient (confirm current rating basis or specify derating).<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Sealing\/enclosure strategy (what is protected, how ingress is managed, any heater\/anti-condensation options).<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Corrosion strategy (materials\/coatings for hardware and external insulation surfaces).<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Maintenance interval adjustment recommendations for heavy pollution or coastal exposure.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p>[Expert Insight]<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>If your site is dirty or coastal, ask how they prevent tracking on external insulation surfaces and what they expect you to clean, and how often.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>\u201cOutdoor\u201d is not one configuration. Cabinet sealing, breathers, heaters, and corrosion strategy strongly influence nuisance issues.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>A vendor who offers a site-specific addendum early often reduces commissioning rework.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\"\/>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"question-set-e-testing-documentation-traceability-and-fat-sat-expectations\">Question set E \u2014 Testing, documentation, traceability, and FAT\/SAT expectations<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>If you want fewer commissioning surprises, define the document pack and acceptance flow in the RFQ\u2014not after the equipment ships. This is also how you reduce the risk of \u201cmodel code swaps\u201d that still carry the same headline rating.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Q11) What is the exact deliverable pack tied to serial numbers (drawings, wiring, test records, as-built set)?<\/strong><br>A strong answer lists the deliverables with revision control and ties routine test records to the breaker serial number.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Deliverable: FAT + documentation + traceability deliverables list<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Quotation-stage:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Model code breakdown + included accessories list<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>GA drawing + interface dimensions<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Wiring diagram + terminal list (matched to control power like 110 VDC)<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Nameplate draft aligned to the quoted kV\/A\/kA duty<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p>FAT package:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Inspection and test plan with acceptance criteria<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Routine test records tied to serial numbers<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Functional check list (close\/trip, interlocks, aux contacts, coils, charging motor)<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Photos of nameplate, wiring terminations, packing condition<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p>Handover pack:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Packing list with serial numbers<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Installation\/operation manual + maintenance checklist<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Commissioning checklist (SAT-ready)<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Warranty statement with start-point definition<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\"\/>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"commercial-logistics-questions-that-prevent-project-delays-cta\">Commercial + logistics questions that prevent project delays {CTA}<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>This is the one block that keeps quotes comparable and reduces late re-quotes. Keep it short, but explicit.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Q12) What is the full commercial scope: lead time, warranty terms, spares strategy, packing, and after-sales response?<\/strong><br>Make them commit in writing.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Deliverable: RFQ Commercial Block + CTA line<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Quantity: ___ sets (initial); forecast: ___ sets\/year<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Lead time: ___ weeks from PO + drawing approval (request split: production + test + packing)<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Incoterms: EXW \/ FOB \/ CIF \/ DAP (port\/city: ___)<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Export packing: seaworthy, moisture protection, shock indicators (yes\/no)<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Warranty: ___ months (start point defined)<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Response commitment: reply within ___ hours; corrective action plan within ___ business days<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Spares: critical spares kit priced for 1 year and 3 years (list + quantity)<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Documentation language: English required (yes\/no)<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Payment terms: ___<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Change control: what triggers re-quote and how revisions are logged<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p>{CTA} If you\u2019d like XBRELE to sanity-check your RFQ before it goes out, send the filled System Data Card plus your single-line and installation notes, and we\u2019ll flag rating gaps and quote-compare traps early.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\"\/>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"faq-rfq-checklist-use\">FAQ (RFQ Checklist Use)<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>1) What\u2019s the quickest way to spot a weak VCB quotation?<\/strong><br>Weak quotes usually avoid committing to configuration details or deliverable lists, which often shows up later as re-quoting or missing documents.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>2) Should I share my protection philosophy in the RFQ?<\/strong><br>A simplified protection concept can help suppliers align interfaces and accessories, while still keeping proprietary settings confidential.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>3) How can I reduce back-and-forth with multiple suppliers?<\/strong><br>Standardize your input block, require a named deliverables list, and ask vendors to restate duty and scope in their first response.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>4) What vendor documents are most useful before placing a PO?<\/strong><br>A stable model code breakdown, GA drawing, and wiring\/terminal list typically prevent scope misunderstandings.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>5) When is a factory acceptance test worth the effort?<\/strong><br>FAT tends to pay off when schedule risk is high, integration is complex, or your handover process requires serial-tied records.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>6) How do I compare two vendors with similar ratings but different prices?<\/strong><br>Compare included accessories, documentation\/traceability commitments, endurance assumptions, and support response terms; those often explain price gaps.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"related-reading-and-selection-resources\">Related Reading and Selection Resources<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/xbrele.com\/vacuum-circuit-breaker\/\">vacuum circuit breaker product overview<\/a> ? practical checks, limits, and commissioning notes<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>A vacuum circuit breaker RFQ goes sideways for two common reasons: suppliers quote a \u201cstandard breaker\u201d that doesn\u2019t match your real duty, or they quote the right nameplate numbers but leave gaps in testing, documentation, and interfaces that later stall commissioning. This checklist is designed to reduce both risks. You\u2019ll get 12 copy-paste RFQ questions, [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":2313,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_gspb_post_css":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[24],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2309","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-vacuum-circuit-breaker-knowledge"],"blocksy_meta":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/xbrele.com\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2309","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/xbrele.com\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/xbrele.com\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/xbrele.com\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/xbrele.com\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2309"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/xbrele.com\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2309\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3636,"href":"https:\/\/xbrele.com\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2309\/revisions\/3636"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/xbrele.com\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/2313"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/xbrele.com\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2309"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/xbrele.com\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2309"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/xbrele.com\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2309"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}