Téléchargez notre catalogue de produits 2025 pour obtenir les schémas détaillés et les paramètres techniques de tous les composants des appareillages de commutation.
Obtenir le catalogue Téléchargez notre catalogue de produits 2025 pour obtenir les schémas détaillés et les paramètres techniques de tous les composants des appareillages de commutation.
Obtenir le catalogue
Vacuum loss and contact erosion can create similar field symptoms in a vacuum circuit breaker, but they are not the same failure. Vacuum loss is a loss of dielectric integrity inside the sealed interrupter bottle. Contact erosion is mechanical and electrical wear of the contact faces after switching load current or fault current.
The practical rule is simple: a failed vacuum integrity test points to interrupter replacement; contact erosion must be confirmed by travel, wipe, erosion indicator, and contact resistance evidence. Do not replace a complete breaker until these two failure modes have been separated.
Use this troubleshooting chart before dismantling the pole assembly. It gives the first test, likely root cause, and next action for the most common field symptoms.
| Symptôme | Premier test | Cause première probable | Action suivante |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hi-pot fails across open contacts | Test d'intégrité sous vide | Vacuum loss inside interrupter | Remove from service and replace interrupter |
| Hi-pot passes, but contact resistance is rising | 100 A micro-ohm test | Contact erosion, contamination, or low contact force | Check travel and wipe before deciding replacement |
| Erosion indicator is at limit | Mechanical inspection | Contact erosion at end of allowance | Replace interrupter or pole assembly |
| Open gap is shorter than OEM value | Travel measurement | Contact wear or mechanism linkage error | Compare with OEM service limit and adjust or replace |
| Restrike or delayed current interruption | Hi-pot plus timing record | Vacuum loss or advanced erosion | Run full diagnostic sequence and review relay event data |
| Hot pole during load operation | Thermal image and contact resistance | High resistance joint or contact erosion | Tighten/clean external joint first, then retest contact path |
Vacuum loss means the interrupter bottle can no longer maintain the dielectric environment required to extinguish the arc at current zero. The field team cannot re-gas or repair the vacuum bottle on site. Once loss of vacuum is confirmed, the correct action is replacement of the interrupter or the complete pole assembly according to the OEM design.
Typical triggers include seal damage, bellows fatigue, ceramic-to-metal joint failure, mechanical shock, or long service age combined with high operation count. The failure can remain silent until a withstand test or a switching event exposes the reduced dielectric margin.
Vacuum loss does not automatically prove that the mechanism is worn or that all three poles must be replaced. If only one pole fails the vacuum test and the OEM allows single-pole replacement, the other poles can remain in service only after they pass the same hi-pot, resistance, and travel checks.
The pass/fail value must come from the OEM manual, project test specification, or the applicable standards context. IEEE C37.09 and IEC 62271-100 provide test-method context, but the service acceptance value for a specific breaker must be confirmed against the manufacturer’s data.
Contact erosion is gradual loss of contact material caused by arcing during load switching and fault interruption. It reduces contact wipe, contact force, and remaining travel. A breaker can still have good vacuum integrity while its contacts are near the wear limit.
The most useful field evidence is not one number. Combine contact resistance, travel, wipe, visible erosion indicator, operation counter, and fault interruption history. A single high micro-ohm reading can come from loose external joints or contaminated surfaces, so confirm that the measurement path is correct before condemning the interrupter.
| Preuve | Contact erosion signal | Vacuum loss signal |
|---|---|---|
| Hi-pot across open contacts | Usually passes until severe damage | Fails or leakage rises sharply |
| Résistance de contact | Often trends upward | May be normal unless contact is damaged |
| Travel and wipe | Reduced from baseline | Usually normal |
| Erosion indicator | At warning or replacement zone | May still look normal |
| Timing record | Bounce or delayed motion possible | Restrike or failed interruption possible |
The safest sequence is to confirm vacuum integrity first, then check contact wear and mechanism evidence. This avoids spending time on detailed travel checks when the interrupter has already failed the basic dielectric test.
Every measurement needs an acceptance source. Generic article values are screening references only.
| Outil ou enregistrement | Ce qu'il vérifie | Source d'acceptation |
|---|---|---|
| AC or DC hi-pot tester | Vacuum integrity across open contacts | OEM manual, IEEE C37.09 context, project specification |
| 100 A micro-ohmmeter | Main contact path resistance | OEM baseline, FAT record, maintenance trend |
| Travel analyzer or dial gauge | Open gap, wipe, rebound, and stroke | OEM travel curve and service limit |
| Testeur de résistance d'isolation | Pole-to-earth and phase-to-phase insulation screening | OEM manual and commissioning specification |
| Analyseur de temps | Opening time, closing time, bounce, simultaneity | OEM timing band and SAT record |
| Operation counter and relay event log | Duty history and fault interruption count | Maintenance record and protection relay log |
Open the contacts to the specified gap, isolate and earth the equipment, then apply the test voltage according to the approved procedure. A flashover, rising leakage current, or unstable withstand result is enough to remove the interrupter from service. If surface contamination is suspected, clean and dry external insulation according to the OEM procedure before repeating the test.
Measure each pole with a four-wire Kelvin connection and enough injection current for stable readings. Record injection current, ambient temperature, instrument serial number, and phase position. A phase that is more than 30% above the other two phases deserves inspection even when the absolute value is still below the OEM maximum.
Measure open gap, total stroke, contact wipe, and rebound. If travel is normal but resistance is high, investigate contact surface condition and external joints. If both travel and resistance are outside limits, contact erosion is the dominant fault and replacement should be planned.
A 12 kV indoor VCB was removed from service after a relay event showed delayed arc extinction on one feeder. The maintenance team measured the following during a planned outage.
| Poteau | Hi-pot result | Résistance de contact | Wipe measurement | Diagnosis |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | Passe | 32 micro-ohm | 2.4 mm | Serviceable |
| B | Fail, leakage rises before hold time | 96 micro-ohm | 1.5 mm | Vacuum loss plus contact erosion |
| C | Passe | 35 micro-ohm | 2.3 mm | Serviceable |
The measured evidence prevents the wrong repair decision. Pole B is not only worn; it also fails the vacuum integrity test, so cleaning the contact face or adjusting travel will not restore interrupting reliability. The corrective action is to replace Pole B interrupter or the complete three-pole assembly if the OEM does not allow matched single-pole replacement. Poles A and C can only remain in service after their test records are added to the maintenance file and the next inspection interval is shortened.
This example also shows why contact resistance alone is not enough. If Pole B had shown 96 micro-ohm but passed hi-pot and travel checks, the first corrective action would be joint inspection, cleaning, and retest. Because hi-pot failed, the decision moves directly to replacement.
Replacement is mandatory when vacuum integrity fails, when travel or wipe is at the OEM wear limit, or when fault operation count exceeds the declared service allowance. Refurbishment is reasonable only when the frame, mechanism, secondary circuit, and pole interfaces remain within specification.
| Decision point | Replace interrupter or pole | Replace complete VCB |
|---|---|---|
| One pole fails vacuum test | Possible if OEM permits matched pole exchange | Required if pole exchange is not supported |
| Multiple poles near wear limit | Usually replace pole set | Consider complete VCB if mechanism is also worn |
| Mechanism travel unstable | Service mechanism first | Replace if parts are obsolete or frame is damaged |
| Age and records | Acceptable if records are complete | Prefer replacement if records are missing and age is high |
| Spare availability | Interrupter available with test report | Complete breaker needed if interrupter is obsolete |
For product selection context, compare the diagnostic result with the XBRELE vacuum circuit breaker page. For acceptance documentation, use the Liste de contrôle pour l'acceptation du TFA/TSA par le VCB.
Before issuing an RFQ, collect the nameplate, wiring diagram, pole dimensions, operating mechanism type, control voltage, rated current, short-circuit breaking current, and the latest test record. A supplier cannot confirm interchangeability from voltage class alone.
| RFQ item | Pourquoi est-ce important ? |
|---|---|
| Rated voltage, BIL, and frequency | Confirms dielectric class |
| Rated current and breaking current | Confirms thermal and fault duty |
| Contact travel and pole dimensions | Confirms mechanical fit |
| Control voltage and auxiliary contact scheme | Prevents secondary circuit mismatch |
| Hi-pot, micro-ohm, and timing records | Shows actual failure mode |
| Required test report and packing method | Protects quality during delivery |
For quotation preparation, use the Liste de contrôle VCB RFQ. For resistance testing method context, review the guide de test de la résistance de contact micro-ohm. For standards context, use the Page de la norme IEEE C37.09 and then verify the final limits against the OEM manual.
Run the vacuum integrity test first, then confirm contact resistance and travel. A failed hi-pot result points to vacuum loss. A passed hi-pot result with rising resistance and reduced wipe points toward contact erosion or contact force problems.
No. A vacuum interrupter with confirmed vacuum loss is not field-repairable. Replace the interrupter or pole assembly according to the OEM design.
No. High contact resistance can also come from loose terminals, contaminated joints, low contact force, or measurement error. Confirm the test connection, compare all three poles, and check travel before deciding replacement.
Use the OEM maintenance interval as the primary source. Shorten the interval after fault interruption, high switching duty, coastal contamination, or missing maintenance records.
Only if the OEM design supports single-pole replacement and the new pole matches the existing frame, travel, interface dimensions, and test requirements. Otherwise replace the matched pole set or complete breaker.
The strongest record combines hi-pot result, contact resistance, travel/wipe, timing, operation count, and visual inspection. One isolated number is weaker than a consistent evidence chain.
Age alone is not always a replacement trigger, but it increases inspection priority. If the breaker passes vacuum, resistance, travel, and timing tests, continue service only with a documented inspection interval and spare strategy.
